Legal, Business, Security, Regulatory Compliance, Educational & Liaison Consultants
The Unexplored Links
Published on July 22, 2005 By Themissociijuris In Health & Medicine
Section-I:



In the early 1990’s I had proposed that, unlike the then popular belief, cancer is not consummative like tuberculosis; rather, it is growth-oriented—albeit a haphazard one. This view has been endorsed by further research.



More than a decade has elapsed since then; but the cause behind this unguided growth is not yet found by our Research Labs. Here is a theoretical framework for further Clinical & Lab research.



There is no system-- akin to Central Nervous System, in the human body which centrally controls the reproduction of cells. The cells grow in an autonomous fashion; however, these cells use the adjacently available DNA-strands as a reference-point in order to determine the cell’s growth-parameters. Hence, DNA is widely replicated within the human body—to serve as a reference standard/measure/point. As such, in humans or plants the DNA has a passive role to play—though a very important one.



When the DNA-strands in a particular portion of the body get corrupted, the cells lose these parameters and start replicating in a haphazard manner. This causes non-malignant tumour—because this corruption is reversible; rather, the body itself refreshes the DNA strands in that area, and sometimes even cocoons the affected portion of the cells. The correction is most probably made by the mRNA which resides in the ‘third cell’—more about this cell in Section-II below.



At other times, these cells lose the ability to communicate with the neighbouring DNAs—either because there is a damage to the outer wall of the cells themselves or because the surrounding chemical is unable to act as an electro-magnetic medium for assisting such communication. This causes malignant tumours.



Section-II: The Third Cell--the unexplained part of Mendel’s exposition on reproduction



Mendel said something like this-:

“A pair of chromosomes is first replicated within the cell, then these two pairs move to the opposite sides of the cell-walls, and then the cell divides into two—each cell having its own pair of chromosomes. And then a third cell appears.”



The research published so far suggests that within a cell there is no such thing as ‘dynamic memory’, all memory is static, i.e. imprinted on something physical—be it the mRNA or DNA, or something else. Further that the second pair of chromosomes is made by first imprinting the existing pair onto the mRNA, and from the mRNA printing it onto the proteins etc—so as to create the second pair of chromosomes. What happened to the pair imprinted on the mRNA?



If the said intermediary pair (printed on the mRNA) cannot be immediately destroyed, then the Nature encapsulates it into a new cell. Most likely than not, this third cell does not have the power to replicate itself. However, the print of the DNA within it can be used for correcting the chance-mutations, if any, in the DNAs of neighbouring cells. But if it outlives its normal life-cycle in an uncocooned state, then it may become a cause for tumours. Ayurveda can remove toxins from the body, and the uncocooned mRNA is one such toxin.



Section-III:



The aforesaid encapsulation of even the mRNA into a third cell warns us that it is dangerous to leave within the human/plant body any proteins onto which DNA/mRNA is printed—because this can mislead the neighbouring cells into multiplying in a haphazard way.

Certain drugs (including steroids) & foods (like the chewing tobacco/betel-nuts or ‘gutka/paan-masala’) may destroy the cell-walls and, thereby, let loose the DNA/mRNA within that cell—which, in turn, may lead to the said haphazard growth.



One of the following factors is the cause for AIDS:-



a) the outer cell-walls are unable to read the DNA-structure of a bacteria/virus and, hence, the production of anti-bodies is not triggered—this is the most likely cause; or



the outer cell-walls read the DNA-structure of a bacteria/virus as ‘friendly’.



If the dominant cause for AIDS is the factor at ( above, then the possibility of a more lethal variant of this mal-function—wherein the DNA-structure of all neighbouring cells is read as ‘foe’, lurks nearby.





Prof. Gulshan Bajwa

e-mail: themissociijuris@yahoo.com


Comments
on Jul 23, 2005
And your link to AIDS is??
on Jul 23, 2005
The main debilitating factor in AIDS is the inability of the affected person's body to distinguish between 'Friends & Foes'--friends are those whose DNA structures are recognised as non-threatening.
on Jul 24, 2005
'Friends & Foes'--friends are those whose DNA structures are recognised as non-threatening.


Do you think also "self" and "non self"? seeing that the virus is not a part of the body before infection and then when infected it has a hard time recognising it due to the RNA sequence it slots itself into?
on Jul 27, 2005
The reference is to the ‘cells’—DNA is and remains a measure. RNA is like a clip-board in Windows O.S..
on Sep 17, 2005
A hard copy of this Article--alongwith the Article titled "Science--Revisited", was sent to His Excellency the President of the Republic of India, who is an eminent scientist, too. His Excellency has been pleased to forward the same to the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (Government of India) --vide communication No.P1/A-49282 dated 17.8.2005.
on Sep 17, 2005
Maybe you should send this to Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba as well.