Why the answers still elude us?
1. Why effective cure for AIDS or Cancer eludes us?
2. What is FUNDAMENTALLY common or distinct between AIDS, Cancer & Tuberculosis?
About three decades ago I had argued that, unlike tuberculosis, cancer did not “consume”—cancer basically involves a process of uncontrolled reproduction.
Cancer and AIDS are both concerned more with software abnormalities of our bodies rather than the hardware ones—I am using the jargon of the IT since the processes therein are more familiar to the common man than the one used in anatomy/biology/medicine.
In Cancer, one or more of the following possibilities may occur:-
i) software-related corruption in the two-way communicative intelligent cells-- the cell which possesses some amount of independent memory (for data & instructions) within itself and has the ability to receive, compare & transmit data as well as the competence to carry out instructions upon itself in the form of its replication, etc;
ii) corruption in the lead-cells, i.e. the cell which serves as the standard or as the drill-captain-- their uncontrolled replication, if not benign, is usually fatal;
iii) corruption in the lines of communication—usually the sub-outer or outer-shell of the cell, etc.
In AIDS, certain additional factors are operative, e.g. the brain, autonomous nervous system, data-storage locations (similar to the updated virus-definitions folder of an Anti-Virus Programme in a PC), and the chemicals which flow between the various nerve-endings and carry messages to & fro, etc. etc.
The intelligent cells are usually located in those organs which need the capability to quickly heal that organ—if injured. Hence, Cancer more likely occurs in (or starts from) these very organs-- this is not necessarily the case with AIDS.
3. Why are the biological researchers unable to SUSTAIN life grown in the Laboratory out of amino acids?
4. Why have the super-cyclotrons failed to give us an insiders’ view into the origin of the Universe?
The effort so far in this field has been to “mechanically” create a collision of the particles—whereas the correct approach is to do so through sound. Incidentally, the stalled ‘Star Wars project’ would have made much greater headway if experiments had been carried out with sound-lasers rather than with light-lasers. [The term “laser” with the word ‘sound’ is herein used symbolically.] Sound-lasers will be the most lethal weapon of this century, and with the longest ever reach.
5. Why do the Korean missiles have a clean lift off whereas the nose-cone of their Indian counterparts shakes/vibrates—despite thousands of scientists, engineers & designers having worked on the missile-project? When the length of a missile reaches 32 feet, then at the time of lift off the gravitational pull at both the ends becomes different—while, at the same time, there is a differential thrust at both the ends.
Themissociijuris
Themissociijuris@yahoo.com