Legal, Business, Security, Regulatory Compliance, Educational & Liaison Consultants
STILL NO BAIL--ITS POLITICAL UNDERTONES
Published on June 12, 2006 By Themissociijuris In The Media
An Impartial Analysis of Rahul’s case

(Suspicious circumstances warranting a CBI Inquiry)

Known facts:-

Two camps
Camp-A
i) Shri AB Vajpayee
ii) Late Shri Pramod Mahajan

Camp-B
a) Shri LK Advani
Shri Yashwant Sinha
c) Shri Jaswant Singh

Source: Mr. PC Srivastava, Adv. (who is at war with the Ambanis of Reliance Group)

Sequence of events:-
Shri Pramod Mahajan shot at—the motive is not strong enough for a murder (of own kin).
Two foreign Doctors and military Doctors called in—situation “stable” though critical.
Shri LK Advani (from the opposite camp) visits Mahajan the second time--suddenly Shri Mahajan’s condition starts deteriorating, and he dies on the second day.

Shri Vajpayee proposes the induction of Rahul into the party—he is set to go to Guwahati to make his debut. June 01 episode occurs.

Unanswered Questions:-
Why would Rahul—who is known to be of ‘reserved’ nature, have impromptu dinner, champagne and drugs with three strangers?
Whether Sahil Zaroo, too, was a stranger to Rahul? Is there any proof which suggest that they were friends?

If Rahul was used to taking drugs knowingly, then why did he consume an overdose? However, the preliminary Medical Bulletin issued by the Apollo Hospital, did not find such “overdose” as may require the administration of a known anti-dote.

Why was, thereafter, a Party-meeting held in Shri Advani’s house and not in the house of the current President of the Party? And on what basis did the Party-spokesperson distance the Party from Rahul on the basis of drugs—when till then even the CFSL had not whispered that the white powder contained ‘heroine’?
And why did, only after the said meeting, the three mysterious persons surrender to the Mandir Marg Police Station—whereas neither the house of Late Shri Pramod Mahajan (7, Safdarjung Road) nor the Apollo Hospital (FIR ought to have ordinarily been registered in PS Sarita Vihar) falls within the jurisdiction of PS Mandir Marg?
Rahul was interrogated only after Sahil, too, had surrendered and been interrogated by the Delhi police.
What transpired during the so called Interrogation of those three persons & Sahil (or may be a conspiracy was hatched and they—the co-accused, were tutored against Rahul)?
Why was the SHO, PS Mandir Marg (who had no jurisdiction at all in this case) the first to Interrogate Rahul at the Hospital? And why was Rahul not allowed to meet his Lawyers before the said Interrogation—moreso, an Interrogation which led to his arrest on the same very day?
Why were 9 persons (the household servants of Late Mr. Pramod Mahajan) detained, beaten and interrogated—without being formally arrested and produced within 24 hours before the concerned Magistrate? What did the police want them to state as independent persons--since whatever the aforesaid 4 persons might have stated will have little evidentiary value because they themselves are the co-accused in the same very case?
The SHO, PS Tughlak Road actively came on the scene only after Shri Vajpayee ji was misled into saying publicly that Rahul had committed a ‘jawani-ki-bhool’? At that time, it was not even being publicly alleged that Rahul had voluntarily consumed the drugs?
And if Rahul was used to taking drugs, then would a ‘non-overdose’ have led to his BP being “non-recordable”—vide the aforesaid Medical Bulletin?

Whereas those who report to hospital (after their arrest) are hospitalised, why was Rahul ‘discharged from hospital’ after his arrest--moreso, within two days of his having been moved out of the ICU?
And whereas those--who become sick while under arrest, are granted bail on medical grounds, why was Rahul sent to police-custody, then to judicial custody, and then the hearing (itself) on his Application for Bail deferred till 13th June?
Is their a motive behind the lodgment of FIR against the Apollo Hospital & Doctors—viz. to terrorise those who may dare to stand by Rahul?

In the aforementioned facts—coupled with the non-compliance of the mandatory ‘search & seizure’ procedures prescribed under the NDPS Act, the entire Investigation stands vitiated. Hence, the police is perhaps trying to make the said 9 persons to make tutored statements. Therefore, it will be prudent to immediately approach the High Court of Delhi to quash the FIR qua Rahul. His Bail in such a Petition is guaranteed.
But his present Counsel may not do so—because he is known to be a Congress (I) ‘neta’.

Post Script: In the last two years alone, in three different cases I have been instrumental in getting three life-convicts acquitted/released within the shortest possible time of 3-6 months--moreso, in one of these cases I did not even have to address ‘oral arguments’ (the lifer was acquitted on the basis of Written Submissions alone). In yet another case, Rule nisi was issued by the Supreme Court without there being any need for oral arguments. And on several occasions, on the basis of my pleadings the rule nisi was issued by the High Court in favour of my clients even when I was not physically present in the court-room. I also won a civil case on the basis of my Written Submissions alone.
Analysis made by:-

PROF. GULSHAN BAJWA
M.B.I.M. (U.K.), M.B.A. (DoM, Pune), C.M.M.(Hyd.),
LL.B. (CLC, Delhi), B.A. (Hons.) Econ. (Hindu College, Delhi),
N.E.T.(Merit, U.G.C.), M.A.(P) Econ. (Delhi School of Economics),
C.P. Russian (JNU), Compu. Prog. (NIIT & Aptech), C.French (Alliance Francaise)
Registered with F.M.S. (Delhi) for Ph.D. in R.D.& D. as S.R.F.(UGC)

General Secretary, Indian Ex-Servicemen’s Bar Association (Regd.)
Joint Secretary, Delhi School of Economics Alumni Association
Executive Editor, Pul-sator; Mg. Trustee, In-Trust Foundation
Coordinator, Resources Development Institute
Advocate-on-Record (Supreme Court of India)

51, Lawyers’ Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi-110 001 (INDIA)
e-mail: Themissociijuris@yahoo.com. Mobile: +(91) 0-9811880999





Comments
on Jun 12, 2006
you are not gonna pose all those very leading questions without providing at least a few definitive and factual answers?
on Jun 12, 2006
Whenever the Congress Party is in POWER criminality rules the roost. Who has forgotten the fact that this party of criminals killed more than 3,500 innocent people in New Delhi alone in 1984. In any civilised society a dynastic fascist criminal party like the Congree would have been laughed off the political stage, but the people of India cling to this relic from the jurassic park. NOw, the Congree MP'S son killed Jessicca Lal and no action is taken, while Rahul Mahajan is being framed. One cannot expect anything decent from a Govet of tailwagging spit licking congressmen.
on Jun 13, 2006
The judicial records, police diaries, the statements made before the TV-Channels and the News-prints taken from the official website of Doordarshan support my analysis. A copy of the same is with Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee, too. As apprehended, one of those 9 persons--who were allegedly detained illegally, is now being made to make a statement upon oath before a Magistrate, WHEREAS the normal practice is that at the investigation-stage statements of the prosecution-witnesses are recorded by the police itself u/s 161 of the Cr.P.C. Moreover, u/s 162 the said statements are not even required to be signed by the said witnesses. Why is the said statement not being recorded by the Special Judge herself?